The Montauk Monster story was posted by Gawker a few days ago. The tipster, along with several witnesses, found a scary-looking creature washed up on the shore near a government animal testing facility. Gawker projects it's viral marketing, which begs the question, for what!? Is monster.com really hurting that badly for hits?
Also, I feel kind of bad for this little guy. Sure, he's ugly, but why are we calling him a monster? Maybe he has a great personality underneath it all.