Tuesday, March 24, 2009

How to Control Brand Messaging on Twitter

Twitter’s claim to fame is fast delivery and response, and consumers have come to appreciate the outstanding customer service such a tool provides. The takeaway from a brand using customer service strategies is a message of care and concern – everything that in-store customer service isn’t. Though, how can brands ensure the key messages part of their created identity will be carried across Twitter feeds? I once said it’s impossible to control brand messages on Twitter, but now I digress after recent revelations.

True, consumers have a powerful voice, but brands can certainly overpower negative and confusing tweets by considering how a consumer typically reaches out to a company on Twitter. Consumers only know how to interact with brands (not the people behind the brands) on Twitter in one way. By offering tweets of praise and complaints, they let the brand rep know the company either is or isn’t doing their job.

Subjectivity is not a good barometer when it comes to brand message development, because a lot of it might be considered blown smoke. (People still reply to @comcastcares with faulty messages about a broken down TV, internet connection, etc. just to see if they’ll actually respond). Knowing the potential for discrepancies, how do brands control the messages on Twitter?

  • It’s all in the profile While I agree with a short bio about the tweeting brand rep, I don’t think it’s wise to blur the lines of professional position vs. personal interests by offering up things like “I love Cheetos” in the Twitter bio. In order to ensure brand messaging consistency, companies need to insert a shorter version of their values, mission, and passion. If too personal, consumers might think a company rep’s love for Cheetos is because he/she works for them. Here's a brief bio example I speak of:

  • Addressing the issue publicly Honestly, what is the point of DMs (besides avoiding spam e-mail) if, by nature, all social networks and blogging platforms are meant to be transparent? Brands can stop a naysayer quicker by @-ing them. A DM message is not searchable, so when consumers are looking for answers via Twitter search, they won’t find a company’s reply to a very strongly worded consumer comment. And if you want to avoid spam e-mail, you can certainly DM them that info if further discussion is necessary.
  • A ground for resource links Twitter is not the only way to communicating a promotion or contest, though companies love to do it all the time. But say a customer was to reply and ask what the promotion was and 140 characters didn’t allow for a good explanation. Hopefully, other communications would come into play, so Twitter could serve as a resource link to additional info on Web sites and blogs. Some companies have avoided this issue altogether by making their Twitter profile more concrete and theme-driven. Here's an example:

  • Two Twitter accounts? If you’re a brand rep on Twitter and you really want to interact on a more personal level, a way that taps into your interests, you should consider creating both a personal Twitter account, and a professional one dedicated to brand values, mission, and passion. While I understand a professional Twitter account heightens the possibility of spam, it’s better than having mixed messages about the brand. If you’re McDonalds, you tweet about special menu deals, new products and service, and countries you love to visit. If you work for McDonalds, you tweet beyond your company and talk about your love for snacking on Cheetos, alternative music, and the hit television series “Lost.”
Remember, it's all about tweet consistency and not blurring the lines. People say mix the personal with the professional, but I have to disagree as personality can be conveyed through a professional Twitter account-- keeping in mind those key messages, values, and passion of an organization. I would argue the former only works if you're self-employed or a C-suite level executive.

What are your thoughts on branding consistency via tweets?

Monday, March 23, 2009

Axiom Featured in Upcoming Fox9 News Segment

Fox9's Trish Van Pilsum stopped by the Axiom offices this past Friday to talk about Facebook Faux Pas. Here's a summary of what happened, and be sure to check out Van Pilsum's segment on Tuesday, March 31 at 9 p.m. on Fox 9 Twin Cities.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Happy One-Year HARO!

Today marks one-year since the first HARO was published. HARO (Help A Reporter Out) was started by the ever-energetic Peter Shankman as a resource for reporters to connect with information, resources, and other people to help with stories. Three times a day a list of requests is published and sent out all over the world. In a year, the list of subscribers is now up to 70,000 strong and growing.

Consider signing up for HARO's list. If you are a reporter looking for sources, this is definitely the place to go. If you are a marketer or PR person, this is a great list for finding opportunities for your clients (just make sure to read and follow the rules). Happy HARO Day!

Thursday, March 19, 2009

TwitterJobSearch.com

Just ran across TwitterJobSearch.com yesterday and thought it was a great tool to share. With a very simple interface (much like Google), TwitterJobSearch.com aggregates all Tweets pertaining to job listings and allows you to search for them. For instance, if you wanted to find jobs in Minneapolis, simply type "Minneapolis" and a list of all the job Tweets in Minneapolis, MN will appear.

If you are in the search for a job I would recommend setting up some RSS Feeds of the jobs you are interested in. Type in the term(s) you are interested in and then click the "Subscribe" button on the page. Now every time the search engine finds a Tweet with your term in it, you will be immediately informed and will be able to react quickly to opportunities.


Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Shameless Self-Promotion: A Good Thing for Targeted Ads

Who ever said that shameless self-promotion wasn’t a good thing? Oh yeah – Twitter. While dozens have dismissed the seemingly too commercial brands as nothing more than spam artists, companies like Google are now relying solely on what you want to say about their ads.

Finally, someone gets what social media is about: a content-driven democracy. Through Google’s new targeted ad approach, you can customize your preferences for the ads that pop up, but first you have to navigate through the many that land on your page as a result of cookies (those parcels of text that are input into a browser).

Still, other social Web companies have yet to catch on, like uStream.TV. Don’t get me wrong—I love uStream, but not the ads they have forced on a lifecaster’s page. I’d prefer to watch Cali Lewis of GeekBrief.TV talk about her video nomination for the Island Reef Job (Vote for Cali!) without the distraction of a Techcrunch ad. Sponsored ads only work if it’s really in the best interests of the consumer watching, not a generalization of the viewing public.

Facebook has somewhat gotten it right, as I don’t think ‘hot bods’ actually correlates to my profile interests of running or boxing. But I have to say, Google is entirely on the right track and I’m looking forward to seeing more shameless self-promotion being the criteria for ads smattered all over the Web… from this point forward.

What do you think about ads on your favorite social network?