Wednesday, February 4, 2009

An Idea for Facebook To Increase Revenue

I don't often think to look for Fan Pages on Facebook. I enjoy getting updates from bands I listen to (some are using the update feature very well) and displaying my support for certain brands or people, but I usually don't actively seek them out. The times I usually "become a fan" are when I notice in my mini-feed that a friend has added a band or group that I also like (maybe the mini-feed wasn't such a bad thing after all?) . A lot of my favorite bands don't have Facebook pages and if they added one, I wouldn't know about it. Here is where an idea Tim and I were talking about comes in.

Facebook should develop a tool that sends users alerts when new pages they might be interested in are created. For example - One of my interests listed is "broomball" (Not sure what broomball is? Check it out here). If a "Broomball" fan page was created, I would be interested in it, so Facebook would notify me of the page's creation ("Hey! A new fan page was created for Broomball. Check it out.").

With the way Facebook already customizes ads on your page based on your profile information, this step doesn't seem like it would be that hard to accomplish. If everyone who was interested in the "Back To The Future" movies knew there was a fan page and joined, a lot more people would be interested in clicking the fan page's ads for "Save The Clock Tower T-Shirts" thus increasing Facebook's revenue. Since people are more likely to click on ads if they are within their area of interest, this new tool would seem to encourage more click-throughs. If Facebook was able to get everyone onto fan pages they liked and clicking ads they were interested in, they could really increase their income.

What do you think?

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

What Lois Whitman-Hess would really like to know about the New PR Landscape

Following a post I did about the aggravation of PR flacks belonging to social networks, I received an invite on the Axiom phone booth from Ms. Lois Whitman-Hess, telling me to call her and discuss what so many PR people are doing wrong.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but because all new media is so subjective in content, anything goes online really—especially if you hide behind “anonymous.” I call those people cowards, but still we are now very much into the world of transparency, mutual self-disclosure, and the “anything goes” mentality. If somebody can do a better job of explaining this, please hit me up here and we’ll give you some blog space.

And now for the new media reality unraveled…

Read, Comment, Repeat
You’re an old-school PR practitioner if you aren’t following this routine, as part of building a relationship using new media platforms, such as blogs, Twitter, FriendFeed (that one’s pretty obvious). But don’t overdo it; don’t flood their space with comments and then soon after pitch them a product or service. Offering valuable information every now and then will engage the reporter in what you’re saying.

For example, a reporter tweets about the upcoming Grammy Awards. You then @ reply them and provide them a link to the winning Grammy Poster artist. I’m not even kidding. Though they’re a tech reporter and write about consumer electronics, address their personal inquiries or interests and the rest will follow…

Reporters will let YOU know
Has it ever occurred to you that you can call a reporter and ask them where they’re at with their stories? I thought it was rather asinine to do this, but welcome to transparency, being candid, and vulnerable. Because reporters (especially tech) are wrapping themselves up in social networks and blogs ALL THE TIME, they now speak this language via phone. Call them. Ask them if they think your product is a fit—that is, after you mention their trend target and recent article. This couldn’t be more spelled out by several chapters on media in this book.

Less is Indeed More
At the beginning of the 21st century, you might’ve noticed reporters and editors giving more long-winded responses to your pitch, and now you’re seeing them less and less in your inbox, perhaps not at all. The new form of e-mail is now based entirely around “time”; meaning the medium helps get the message across fast. Reporters don’t have the time because they're always on deadline and worrying about their position being eliminated.

Reporters don’t want to see pitches in paragraph form. They want some bullets and a snappy note sent to them as to why readers would like to hear about X,Y,Z. That’s it—press releases don’t work—even if a reporter tells you to send one. This is their P.C. way of saying, “Hit the road.” (Even if you research them and tie a pretty bow on your pitch package by mentioning their article in the subject line, it will still be dismissed.) This was pointed out to me when I had the opportunity to sit down with a Time Magazine reporter in New York prior to attending next day’s Digital PR 2.0 Summit. Even the e-mails she gets from her PR friends that go past one page are deleted, regardless of effectively addressing her coverage area. Consider this: if you were full and wanted to fit in some dessert, would you go for the plate with the smallest, indulgent pie slice? You would if you don’t want an overwhelming stomach ache.

The Opportunity to “Explode” Your Client’s Brand
Though this is a very overused term part of the PR industry, “strategic” is a wise move. Thanks to social networks, you now have all-out access to understanding how influential a reporter’s blog is, i.e. through trackbacking, linkbuilding, retweets. Though reporters don’t have time, PR people need to have LOTS of time. If you can identify the reporter’s sphere of influence, you’re golden. If you can’t, you’re another cashew in the can. Be like pistachio.

For example, if you know that a reporter’s blog is highly trafficked and that they’re known to tweet their blog entries, you can garner the attention of not only the blogger’s visitors and subscribers, but the many Twitter followers as well. Don’t be surprised that these numbers can amount to more than that print newspaper you’re going after in Los Angeles.

Selling your pitch to a reporter will take time, but start learning their habits on the various social media platforms, and you can see where to position your discussion with them. You’ll be way ahead of the rest and you no longer have that “flack” label.

Apologies are accepted
As you may or may not know, Lois received a lot of flack for what she says was an inaccurate display of client representation. Apparently, she doesn’t even work for the company mentioned. Navigating the new media, people are bound to make mistakes, but a reporter welcomes an apology. I appreciated my conversation with Lois and commend her for stepping forward and saying she just doesn’t get it, why it’s not okay to send out product releases to the entire CES registered attendees list, and why people can step forward and blog without consulting the source of criticism.

Lois, welcome to social media.

Monday, February 2, 2009

Biggest Superbowl Commercial Flop?

Biggest Superbowl Commercial Flop?
SoBe Life Water 3D
Budweiser Clydesdales
Troy Polamalu Mean Joe Greene Coke
Miller High Life One-Second Spots
GoDaddy.com
Frosted Flakes Plant A Seed
Other (Leave Comment)
pollcode.com free polls

An interesting trend with Superbowl commercials this year was that there were advertisements for the advertisements ("Get your 3D Glasses for this years' SoBe commercial!" or "Miller running 1-second ads! Keep your eyes open.") . Even with extra hype surrounding some of these ad campaigns this year, many fell flat. Please leave your comments on which commercials you think flopped the most.

Why social networks aren’t for PR Flacks

HARO has helped thousands upon thousands of reporters push their need for content via social network. It even helped me receive some ink for Axiom, per Julio Ojeda-Zapata’s last-minute “Twitter bad for business” request. Still, in the midst of agencies’ desperation for hits to keep client retention high, PR people get a little desperate – resulting in more flacks than friends online.

While Shankman does a really good job of disclaiming proper HARO etiquette here, discussions about PR spam on social networks continue. We’re now seeing posts about proper Twittiquette, a story angle most likely perpetuated by mishaps like these. Despite the attempts to curtail the flacks, peeps like Lois Whitman-Hess are among the many that have or are in the midst of infiltrating social networks. Reporters, journalists, and sound PR peeps-- time to put on your hard hats and dig hard.

If I were a reporter, I don’t think I would appreciate the many social media enthusiasts’ attention to detail in documenting myself and the many other media now part of Twitter. If you think pitching is bad on e-mail, wait for it—just wait for it on Twitter. Sure, you can choose to respond, but the quick update feed might send your head spinning.

A marketer like me, Jim Connolly is a perfect example of how pitches on a Twitter feed can be so daunting—enough to send you packing for FriendFeed. Suddenly e-mail seems tolerable again.

Don’t undermine flacks. They understand that the key to a reporter’s heart, in addition to successfully helping them out with a story deadline, is knowing their kids’ names and favorite pastimes, commenting on their latest family adventure with Garmin, or explaining to them what #followfriday is on Twitter. Following the “thanks” or the @ reply, the leftfield pitches and follow-ups soon commence, as proper correspondence does not lie within flacks’ vocabulary. Plus, being human is even more insanely hard. Flacks are anything but human, so it’s a wonder why transparency is so time-consuming. I repeat; it’s not in their make-up, but well within Facebooker and blogger confines.

So...the next time a blogger reprimands you for not properly using Twitter, or Peter Shankman sends out a mass HARO alert with another etiquette disclaimer at the tip top of his e-mail, take it very personal. The last thing you want attached to your e-mail pitch is “flack” and BULLSH…

If you're having difficulty, check out this site

So what do you think? How can PR professionals befriend reporters on HARO and other social networks? How have you been successful in your approach?

Friday, January 30, 2009

$3,000,000 for 30 Seconds

Wanna buy a Superbowl ad?

* Word of warning - just because you have funny or memorable commercial idea does not always mean you will be successful because of it.

Millions of people will see your brand and many may remember your commercial, but not all of them want to buy a dog toy.

Here's one alternative. Here's another idea. And you should probably watch and think about this.

The world of ads is changing and not just because of a bad economy.